Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:51812-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3180 of 2025 1 - Arif Khan S/o Rafik Khan Aged About 35 Years 2 - Sakila Begam W/o Rafik Khan Aged About 63 Years 3 - Shama Parvin W/o Akram Ansari Aged About 32 Years All R/o Ward No. 01 Bhutahakola Budhar, District Shahdol (M.P.) 4 - Shahina Danish W/o Danish Mirza Aged About 31 Years R/o Aasma City Phase-04, Quarter No. AO/1, P.S. Sakri, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Mahila Thana, Distt - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Shagufi Khan W/o Arif Khan Aged About 30 Years R/o Ganesh Nagar, Chuchuhiyapara, Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Akash Soni, Advocate For Respondent No.1-State : Mr.Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble
Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Mr. Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge
Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR
2 17.10.2025
1. Mr.Akash Soni, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has filed the Memo of Appearance on behalf of the petitioners today itself and defaults pointed out by the Registry have already been removed. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the following prayer :-
“It is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the instant petition and further be pleased to set-aside/quashed the Final report No 52/2025 in crime No. 42/2025 registered in Police Station Mahila Thana Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, and criminal case No. 21759/2025 pending before JMFC Bilaspur District-Bilaspur (C.G.), in the interest of justice.”
3. From perusal of the prayer and pleadings made in the instant petition, it transpires that the petitioners have challenged the charge-sheet, but the order taking cognizance passed by the Magistrate has not been challenged, which goes to show that the prayer drafted by learned counsel for the petitioners is in a very casual manner and further wasted the precious time of the Court, as such, in the opinion of this Court, the prayer is defective one. 4.
Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed on this ground alone with liberty to file afresh petition with appropriate prayer, subject to
3 depositing a sum of Rs.1,000/- as cost by the petitioners in the Registry of this Court and the same shall be transmitted to the Government Disabled College, Mana Camp, Raipur (C.G.). 5. Certified copy of the documents annexed with this petition shall be returned to counsel for the petitioners after retaining the photocopies of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu