Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49863 (AP)

VVR KRISHNAM RAJU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/5920/2025 · 2025-06-29

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[33?7].^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI^^^'^'^ TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX :PRESENT: / -'ft \ .yX‘.-.Tv^V J,. THE HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA ^ ^ lA No. 1 OF 2026 IN CRLP NO: 5920 OF 2025 / Between: V.V.R Krishnam Raju, S/o. Vadapalli Bapiraju, Aged65 years, Occ Journalist, R/o Door No.20-3/2-35/1, New Ayodhyanagar, 0pp. Bharat Soudha, Vijayawada -3, N.T.R district ...Petitioner/A1 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Amaravathi, Through Station House Officer, Tullur P.S, Tullur Mandal, Guntur District, A.P. ... Respondent/Complainant Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI AKULA VAMSI KRISHNA / 1 Counsel for the Respondent: ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Petition under Section 528 OF BNSS, is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to relax / modify the condition imposed vide order dated 27.11.2025 in I.A. No.1 of 2025 in CRLP No.5920 of 2025, by exempting the Petitioner herein / Accused from marking weekly attendance, subject to his undertaking to appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required for the purpose of investigation, pending investigation in so far as the Petitioner herein / Accused is concerned. Pending disposal of CRLP No. 5920 of 2025, on the file of the High Court. The court while directing issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as to why this application should not be complied with, made th^ following order.(The receipt of this order will be deemed to be the receipt of notice in the case). ORDER This petition is filed seeking to relax/modify the condition imposed vide order dated 27.11.2025 in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in Crl.P.No.5920 of 2025 by exempting the petitioner/accused from marking weekly attendance, subject to his undertaking to appear before the Investigating Officer and when required. as Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing on behalf of the State. Considering the submissions made, the condition imposed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 27.11.2025 in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in Crl.P.No.5920 of 2025 i.e., The petitioner shall now appear before the Station House Officer, Tadepalll Police Station, Guntuf District once a week, i.e., every Sunday between 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 jp.m., till filing of the charge sheet” Is modified as hereunder: “The petitioner shall now appear before the Station House Officer^ Tadepalli Police Station, Guntur District, on every 2"** and 4*'’ Sunday of every month between 10:00 am and 05:00 pm, till filing of charge sheet Accordingly, the I.A.No.1 of 2026 is disposed of. ” 5 SD/-K.J.RAJA BABU ASSISTANT SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// to. 1. The Judicial 1st Class Magistrate, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. The Superintendent, District Jail, Guntur. The Station House Officer, Tadepalli Police Station, Guntur District, A.P. 2. 3. 7 4. One CC to Sri. Akula Vamsi Krishna, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] One spare copy 5. 6. ADP I K 1 HIGH COURT Dr.VJP.J DATED:31/03/2026 i' ORDER i lA No. 1 OF 2026 IN CRLP NO: 5920 OF 2025 DIRECTION f i i. V. 'i