Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4986 (UTT)

MAHENDRA BHOJ v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/675/2020 · 2025-06-06

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.675 of 2020 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Pradeep Chamyal, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned DAG along with Mr. Vikas Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned State Counsel submits that after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner on 03.02.2021. 4. In view of the statement, made by learned State Counsel, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 6. However, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the charge-sheet in appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 06.06.2025 AK