APHC010457712023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. SIRISANAGANDLA SURESH, S/O. S.RAGHUPATHI RAO, AGED 42 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 7 ATMAKUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRI 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINNER, P.R.I. (PIU) DIVISION, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYATI RAJ SUB DIVISION, ATMAKUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, MANDAL PRAJA PARISHAD, ATMAKUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 23695/2023 SIRISANAGANDLA SURESH, S/O. S.RAGHUPATHI RAO, AGED 42 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 7-96-9, RAJA NAGAR, KARIVENA VILLAGE, ATMAKUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINNER, P.R.I. (PIU) DIVISION, KURNOOL THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYATI RAJ SUB DIVISION, ATMAKUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, MANDAL PRAJA PARISHAD, ATMAKUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI SIRISANAGANDLA SURESH, S/O. S.RAGHUPATHI RAO, AGED 42 9, RAJA NAGAR, KARIVENA VILLAGE, ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINNER, P.R.I. (PIU) DIVISION, KURNOOL THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYATI RAJ SUB- THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, MANDAL PRAJA PARISHAD, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in withholding the payment of amounts even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the work of Construction of Anganwadi Centre Building-1 at Sreepathirao Peta (V) of Atmakur Mandal vide Agreement No. /2018-19, dated 05.11.2018 as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay an amount of Rs.6,88,995/- due to the petitioner in respect of execution of afore mentioned works forthwith and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to take steps for paying the amount of Rs.6,88,995/- due to the petitioner in respect of the work executed by him, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GINJUPALLI SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 3 The Court made the following order: Non-payment of balance amount due to the petitioner in respect of the work duly executed by him vide agreement dated 05.11.2018, despite finalization of the bills by the respondent authorities, is the grievance in the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for consideration today, Sri K.Chennakesavulu, learned counsel, representing Sri Ginjupalli Subbarao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the respondent authorities have released the amount due to the petitioner and the petitioner has received the same. Hence, no further orders are required to be passed in this Writ Petition and prayed to close the Writ Petition. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 10.12.2025 MP 4 156 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION No.23695 of 2023 Dated : 10.12.2025 MP