HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13088/2025 Rajpal @ Raju S/o Kawar Singh, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Jakhorpur Tehsil Kotkasim, District Khairthal-Tijara, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas (Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashvin Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Addl.GA/PP Mr. Samarth Sharma JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 17/10/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner in connection with FIR No.378/2024, registered at Police Station Kotkasim, District Khairthal-Tijara wherein he is charged for offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 126(2), 329(3), 333, 324(4), 109(1), 351(2) BNS and 3/25, 25(6) and 5/27 of the Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the alleged offence is under Section 307 IPC, but none of the injured has sustained any grievous injury on vital part. Counsel submits that the grievous injuries suffered by the injured persons are found to be on non-vital parts on their bodies i.e. hands and legs. Counsel submits that the co-accused persons have been granted bail and the case of the petitioner is at par (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13088/2025] with them and trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore same indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner as well. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant opposed the prayer and submitted that ten other criminal cases have been registered against the petitioner, so looking to the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, the application submitted by him be rejected. 4. In rebuttal, counsel for the petitioner submitted that in all the above-said criminal cases, the petitioner has been acquitted and in some of the matters benefit of probation has been extended and as on date, no criminal case is lying pending against him. Lastly, he argued that the last matter was pertaining to the year 2014, thereafter, no other case except the present one has been registered against the petitioner. He further submits that in the case registered in the year 2023, the petitioner has not been named an an accused. 5. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record. 6. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that all grievous injuries suffered by the injured persons have been found to be on non-vital parts of the body and also looking to the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 08.09.2025 and trial will take its own time to conclude and without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS. (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13088/2025] 7. (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13088/2025] 7. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Rajpal @ Raju S/o Kawar Singh arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. However, in case the petitioner is found involved in committing and repeating the same offence in future, the Public Prosecutor/Investigation Officer would be at liberty to move application for cancellation of his bail before the jurisdictional Court. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/211