Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49852 (AP)

Shaik Jani Basha, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/17609/2019 · 2025-11-11

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010368522019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 17609/2019 Between: 1. SHAIK JANI BASHA, S/O.MOULALI, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC- PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O. DOOR NO.86-1-283,7TH LANE, YATHIRAJA NAGAR, BEHIND K.V.P. COLONY, NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NAGARAMPALEM POLICE STATION, NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR. 4. SHAIK SHABBIR, S/O. KASIM, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC- COOLI, R/O. SIVARAMA NAGAR, 6TH LANE, GUNTUR. 5. SHAIK MEER SYED, , S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC- REAL ESTATE, R/O. SIVARAMA NAGAR, 7TH LANE, GUNTUR. 6. MANDI SUBHANI, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC- REAL ESTATE, R/O. SIVARAMA NAGAR, 7TH LANE, GUNTUR. 2 7. SHAIK KASIM SHAID, S/O. VAHAB BASHA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O. SIVARAMA NAGAR, 6TH LANE, GUNTUR. 8. SHAIK YUSUF, S/O. VAHAB BASHA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O. SIVARAMA NAGAR, 6TH LANE, GUNTUR. 9. KHAN SHAID, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O. YATHIRAJA NAGAR, 4TH LANE, GUNTUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondent No.2 and 3 in acting on the complaint, dated 28-06-2017 and registering the crime against respondents No.4 to 9 as arbitrary, illegal, abdication of the statutory duty cast on him and violate the fundamental rights guaranteed to me under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No. 3 to act on the compliant, dated 28-06-2017 submitted by me and take action on the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondent No. 3 to act on the compliant, dated 28-06-2017 submitted by me and take appropriate action on the same, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V N KIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.17609 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondent No.2 and 3 in acting on the complaint, dated 28-06-2017 and registering the crime against respondents No.4 to 9 as arbitrary, illegal, abdication of the statutory duty cast on him and violate the fundamental rights guaranteed to me under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No. 3 to act on the compliant, dated 28-06-2017 submitted by me and take action on the same and pass …” 2. Sri S.Ashok Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri P.V.N.Kiran Kumar, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 12.11.2025 Pmk 4 28 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:17609 OF 2019 Date:12.11.2025 Pmk