Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49849 (ALL)

LALARAM v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/8350/2025 · 2025-04-28

Vivek Kumar Birla, Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:66124-DB Court No. - 43 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8350 of 2025 Petitioner :- Lalaram Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd Shahrukh Wasim Ansari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J. 1. Heard Shri Mohd Shahrukh Wasim Ansari, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State-respondents. 2. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 05.05.2024, registered as Case Crime No. 40 of 2024, under Sections 307, 506 IPC, PS Nayagaon, District Etah, and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report. 3. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is a delay of lodging the first information report because of previous enmity in relation to Pradhan elections and in any case no offence as alleged has been made out. 4. Per contra, learned AGA pointed out that in the present case charge sheet No.44 of 2024, under Sections 307, 506 IPC and Sections 3/25/27 of Arms Act has been submitted which was accepted by the court concerned vide order dated 05.08.2024 and by drawing attention to the statement of Nand @ Nadram co-accused, it is pointed out that he himself has admitted that he and the petitioner herein, Lala Ram have fired first firing on the victim. The injured victim, who received firearm injuries has deposed against the petitioner. Both have reached on the spot with country made pistol with the intention of killing him, due to which Akash was shot in his right thigh and was seriously injured. The accused persons ran away after threatening to kill him. The role played by both the accused are identical in nature and a cognizable offence is made out against the petitioner. 5. The petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 29.4.2025 RKM Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad