Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 49847 (BOM)
SUNITA SHRIDHAR AGRAWAL v. STATE OF MAH, THR P.SO. P.S. AHERI DISTT. GADCHIROLI and 8 OTHERS
WP/402/2019 · 2025-03-03
Shri Nitin W Sambre, Vrushali V Joshi
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49847 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49847 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 5.wp.402.19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 402/2019 Sunita Shridhar Agrawal and Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. R. P. Kothari, Advocate h/f. Mr. R. R. Vyas, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. I. J. Damle, A.P.P. for Respondent No1, 3 to 9/State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 03/03/2025. . Since the investigation is complete and the First Information Report discloses a cognizable offence, the petition is not pressed and the same stands disposed of as infructuous.
2. However, once the petitioners are chargesheeted, it shall be open for the petitioners to either apply for discharge or to question the charge-sheet.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) RGurnule 2025:BHC-NAG:2133-DB