Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49846 (RAJ)

DR BHANU PRAKASH SHARMA S/O SHRI MAN MOHAN SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/17793/2025 · 2025-11-19

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47265] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17793/2025 Dr Bhanu Prakash Sharma S/o Shri Man Mohan Sharma, Aged About 51 Years, R/o 75, Shastry Nagar, Tonk Presently Working As Assistant Professor (Hindi) In Government College, Uniara, District Tonk. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Commissioner, Commissionerate Of College Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Shiksha Sankul, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur. 3. Principal, Government College, Uniara, District Tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Pathak For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 19/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, prayed that this writ petition may kindly be accepted and allowed and by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the order dated 24.12.2024 so far as it relates to the petitioner and adversely affects his rights may kindly be quashed and set aside. The respondents may kindly be directed to grant the selection scale to the petitioner from the year 2010 when it was sanctioned to him, [2025:RJ-JP:47265] (2 of 3) [CW-17793/2025] as has been done in the case of other similarly situated persons and accordingly grant the Pay Band-IV to the petitioner from the year 2013 and the arrears whereof, it any, may also be paid to the petitioner with interest @12% p.a. The respondents may kindly be directed to hold the petitioner to apply for the post of Professor and accept his application form and after his selection, he be given posting on the said post, with all consequential benefits.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon order dated 23.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9950/2025 Jitendra Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. [2025:RJ-JP:47265] (3 of 3) [CW-17793/2025] 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /94