APHC010252072004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 18189/2004 Between: 1. KUMBA VENU GOPAL,, S/O DORASWAMY NIL RESIDENT OF KANTEPALLY VILLAGE, VENKATACHALAM MANDAL, NELLOR DISTIRCT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE COMMI DIR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION 2 ORS, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTORCUMCHAIRMAN, DISTRICT SELECTION COMMITTE-2002 NELLORE. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, NELLORE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toTo issue an appropirate writ, order or direction, preferably, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No.1 in LDis. No.6390/Rc.3/2002, dt. 16/01/2003 starting that the candidates with PDC Certificate are not eligible for appointment to the post of Language Pandits, Grade-II under untrained quota and communicated to the Petitioner by Respondent No.3 in Rc.No.2293/A1/2, dt. 21/04/2003 rejecting my selection is arbitrary, illegal and opposed to the principles of Language Pandit, Grade-II Telugu in untrained Quota in the exiting vancanies IA NO: 1 OF 2004(WPMP 23891 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the Respondent not to fill up one post from among the existing vacancies in the post of Language Pandits, Grade-II, Telugu during pendency of the above WP. IA NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP 29983 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to hear the writ petition No.18189 of 2004 as out of turn basis and pass such other order or orders as this Hon`ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SOMESWARA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR EDUCATION 2. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER: On 12.07.2024, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter has been listed finally. Despite such direction, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 22nd September, 2025 RKS