ROHIT KUMAR NANGLIYA S/O SHRI MALIRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1353/2025 · 2025-08-04
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4984 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4984 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:30166] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1353/2025 Rohit Kumar Nangliya S/o Shri Maliram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 3443, Raigaron Ki Kothi, Ps Ramganj, District Jaipur North Presently Houes No. 08, Jagannathpuri, Purana Bagrana, Mali Ki Kothi, Police Station Kanota, Jaipur East. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Ratan Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG Mr. Ashok Choudhary for Mr. Deepak Chauhan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 04/08/2025
1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Rohit Kumar Nangliya S/o Shri Maliram, in FIR No. 643/2024 dated 10.06.2024 registered at P.S. Kanota, District – Jaipur City (East), whereby the applicant-accused was charged under Section/s 302, 201 and 120-B of IPC.
2. The applicant Rohit Kumar Nangliya S/o Shri Maliram, was arrested and is in judicial custody since then. The Court below has dismissed the bail application.
3.
Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Learned
[2025:RJ-JP:30166] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-1353/2025] counsel further submits that as per allegation in complaint, daughter of complainant got married to present petitioner accused on 25.11.2022 and his daughter has committed suicide on 23.05.2024. He further submitted that initially the report was registered without any allegation but later, FIR was registered through a complaint. He further submitted that there is no allegation of demand of dowry and cruelty for non-fulfilment of demand for dowry. Learned counsel has further submitted that initially a report was registered under Section 302 IPC and after investigation a charge-sheet has been filed under Section 304-B of IPC though there is no allegation of demand of dowry. Further he submitted that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicant-accused is required for further investigation, the applicant-accused will be available for such investigation. He also submitted that the investigation/trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant- accused in custody.
4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned AAG and
learned counsel for complainant. Learned counsel for complainant has submitted that there are serious allegations and looking to charges it is apparent that deceased Neelu was murdered by present petitioner within two years of marriage.
5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned AAG. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties.
[2025:RJ-JP:30166] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-1353/2025]
6. On the basis of criminal complaint filed before the Metropolitan Magistrate no.15, Bassi Jaipur Metropolitan FIR no. 643/2024 was registered at P.S. Kanota, District Jaipur City (East) under Sections 302, 201 and 120-B but after investigation police has filed a charge-sheet under Section 304-B of IPC. We have considered post-mortem and the statement of witnesses.
7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, though some of the statement clearly indicate that deceased has committed suicide which includes statement of Sapna Regar, a relative of deceased, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant-accused Rohit Kumar Nangliya S/o Shri Maliram.
8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Rohit Kumar Nangliya S/o Shri Maliram is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused Rohit Kumar Nangliya S/o Shri Maliram is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of ₹25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with
evidence or influence the witness in any manner.
[2025:RJ-JP:30166] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-1353/2025] (ii) The applicant accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be cancelled.
9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN), J CHETNA BEHRANI /39