APHC010069052011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15781/2011 Between: 1. SMT.B.R.RATNASHREE, W/O S.K.CHANDRA SHEKAR HOUSE HOLD DUTIES R/O SRI BALAJI TRADES, AMARAPURAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD A GOVT OF INDIA, ENTERPRISES) HAVING ITS REGISTRATION OFFICE AT 17, JAMSHEDJI TATA ROAD, MUMBAI, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD A GOVT OF INDIA, ENTERPRISES) VIJAYAWADA LPG REGIONAL OFFICE, IDA, KONDAPALLI KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS COORDINATOR. 3. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD A GOVT OF INDIA, ENTERPRISES) ANANTAPUR REGIONAL OFFICE,R.R.MANSION,1- 4-609, 2ND FLOOR, HLC COLONY, ANANTAPUR- 515 001, REP.BY ITS COORDINATOR. 4. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD A GOVT OF INDIA, ENTERPRISES) ANANTAPUR REGIONAL OFFICE,R.R.MANSION,1- 4-609, 2ND FLOOR, HLC COLONY, ANANTAPUR- 515 001, REP.BY ITS SENIOR REGIONAL MANAGER. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 JS,J W.P.No.15781/2011 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 4th Respondent in issuing the impugned Proceedings No.SSP/LPG, dated 14.05.2011 in disqualifying the petitioner for allotment of LPG Dealership at Amarapuram, Anantapur District, as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondents to allot the LPG Dealership of Amarapuram Village and Mandal, Ananatpur District in favour of the Petitioner IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 18899 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned Proceedings No.SSP/LPG, Dated 14.05.2011 of the 4th Respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAVI SHANKAR JANDHYALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI 3 JS,J W.P.No.15781/2011 The Court made the following ORDER: No representation for the petitioner. 2. Though the matter was listed today under the caption “for dismissal”, there was no representation for the petitioner. 3. On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4 submits that the petitioner has filed W.P.No.25878 of 2011 questioning the conditional letter issued to the 4th respondent – Sri G.B. Shiva Kumar and further submits that the 4th respondent is operating the petrol bunk since the year 2011. 4. In view of the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. 5. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 10.09.2025 KAS