Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49835 (AP)

BETHAMCHARLA RAGHU BABU v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/25205/2025 · 2025-09-24

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010481682025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25205/2025 Between: 1. BETHAMCHARLA RAGHU BABU, S/O PEDDA NARASIMHA RAO, R/O H.NO.22-169, MADDI MALLAIAH STREET, WARD NO.16, CHILAKALURIPET, PURUSHOTHA PATNAM, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEDANANDIPADU POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHUKKA KRANTHI KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue an appropriate Direction, Order or Writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to release or deliver forthwith the vehicle bearing registration no.AP39U3554, which was seized by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Pedanandipadu Police Station, Guntur District, in connection with Crime - FIR No.52/2025, to the petitioner in the interest of justice.” 2 2. Sri C.Kranthi Kiran, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that this petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondent authorities for release of the vehicle which was seized relating to Crime No.52 of 2025. 3. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police have produced the vehicle before the concerned Magistrate Court, and the petitioner may avail the statutory remedy by filing a petition before the said Court. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before the concerned Magistrate Court in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _______________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:25.09.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.25205 of 2025 Dt.25.09.2025 Asr