AKHILESH KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/15628/2025 · 2025-07-20
Raj Beer Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49830 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49830 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:117944 Court No. - 71 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 15628 of 2025 Applicant :- Akhilesh Kumar Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ravi Sahu Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This application u/s 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as 'BNSS') has been filed for quashing of the entire proceedings, including charge-sheet dated 28.11.2023 as well as cognizance / summoning order dated 14.02.2024, of Case No. 46763 of 2024, arising out of Case Crime No.465 of 2023, under Sections 420, 406, 506 IPC, P.S.- Naubasta, District- Kanpur Nagar, pending in the court of Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the first information report has been lodged making false allegations. It is further submitted that by impugned order dated 14.02.2024 applicant has been summoned for offence under Sections 420, 406, 506 I.P.C. and as per law laid down in case of Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. and Others Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another 2024 SCC Online SC 2248, offence of cheating viz-a-viz criminal breach of trust are independent and distinct and both cannot exist simultaneously and on this account alone the impugned summoning order is liable to be set aside. 4. Perusal of record shows that by impugned order dated
14.02.2024 applicant has been summoned under Sections 420, 406 I.P.C., besides Section 506 IPC. As stated above, in case of Delhi Race Club (supra), it has been held by the Hon'ble Apex Court that offence of cheating viz-a-viz criminal breach of trust are independent and distinct and the same cannot exist simultaneously in same set of facts and that they are antithetical to each other. Thus, it is clear that impugned summoning order is not in accordance with law. 5. In view of the aforesaid, the impugned summoning order dated 14.02.2024, qua the applicant, passed by the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar, is hereby set aside and the matter is remitted back to the court concerned to pass the order on the point of summoning afresh, expeditiously in accordance with law. 6. The application u/s 528 BNSS is finally disposed of in above terms.
Order Date :- 21.7.2025 'SP'/- Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad