Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49829 (PAT)

Bedanand Rajak @ Vedanand Rajak v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./37102/2025 · 2025-07-24

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37102 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2025 Thana- KRITYANAND NAGAR District- Purnia ====================================================== 1. Bedanand Rajak @ Vedanand Rajak S/o Ram Prasad Rajak R/o Bairgachhi, P.S- K.Nagar District- Purnea (Bihar ). 2. Deepak Kumar S/o Bedanand Rajak @ Vedanand Rajak R/o Bairgachhi, P.S- K.Nagar District- Purnea (Bihar ). 3. Raja Kumar S/o Bedanand Rajak @ Vedanand Rajak R/o Bairgachhi, P.S- K.Nagar District- Purnea (Bihar ). 4. Sadanand Rajak S/o Late Ram Prasad Rajak R/o Bairgachhi, P.S- K.Nagar District- Purnea (Bihar ). 5. Ranjeet Rajak S/o Sadanand Rajak R/o Bairgachhi, P.S- K.Nagar District- Purnea (Bihar ). 6. Sanjeev Rajak S/o Sadanand Rajak R/o Bairgachhi, P.S- K.Nagar District- Purnea (Bihar ). 7. Mukesh Rajak S/o Permanand Rajak R/o Bairgachhi, P.S- K.Nagar District- Purnea (Bihar ). 8. Rajesh Rajak @ Rajesh Kumar S/o Permanand Rajak R/o Bairgachhi, P.S- K.Nagar District- Purnea (Bihar ). 9. Permanand Rajak S/o Late Ram Prasad Rajak R/o Bairgachhi, P.S- K.Nagar District- Purnea (Bihar ). 10. Yogranand Rajak @ Yoganand Rajak S/o Late Ram Prasad Rajak R/o Bairgachhi, P.S- K.Nagar District- Purnea (Bihar ). 11. Nitish Rajak @ Nitish Kumar S/o Yogranand Rajak @ Yoganand Rajak R/o Bairgachhi, P.S- K.Nagar District- Purnea (Bihar ). 12. Rohit Rajak @ Rohit Kumar S/o Yogranand Rajak @ Yoganand Rajak R/o Bairgachhi, P.S- K.Nagar District- Purnea (Bihar ). 13. Umanand Rajak S/o Jagdish Rajak R/o Bairgachhi, P.S- K.Nagar District- Purnea (Bihar ). 14. Vikash Rajak @ Bikash Kumar S/o Umanand Rajak R/o Bairgachhi, P.S- K.Nagar District- Purnea (Bihar ). 15. Prakash Rajak S/o Umanand Rajak R/o Bairgachhi, P.S- K.Nagar District- Purnea (Bihar ). 16. Shobhanand Rajak S/o Late Jagdish Rajak R/o Bairgachhi, P.S- K.Nagar District- Purnea (Bihar ). 17. Lalan Kumar S/o Shobhanand Rajak R/o Bairgachhi, P.S- K.Nagar District- Purnea (Bihar ). 18. Prince Kumar Rajak @ Prince Kumar S/o Ganori Rajak R/o Bairgachhi, P.S- K.Nagar District- Purnea (Bihar ). ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37102 of 2025(2) dt.24-07-2025 2/3 For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 24-07-2025 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during pendency of this bail petition, petitioner no. 2, 7 and 9 namely Deepak Kumar, Mukesh Rajak and Permanand Rajak have been arrested and as such, this petition has become infructuous so far as petitioner nos. 2, 7 & 9 are concerned. 2. The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed, so far as petitioner nos. 2, 7 & 9 are concerned. 3. The petitioners (i.e. petitioner nos. 1, 3 to 6, 8 & 10 to 18) apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 90, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 74, 303(2), 324(4), 329(2), 351(2), 118(1) of B.N.S., 2023. 4. It is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons including these petitioners assaulted the informant and her family members, as a result of which, altogether nine persons sustained injuries. 5. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. From perusal of the F.I.R., it is apparent that there is general and omnibus allegation of assault and no specific overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. He further submits that present Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37102 of 2025(2) dt.24-07-2025 3/3 case is counter blast of Krityanand Nagar P.S. Case No. 72 of 2025, which was lodged from the petitioners’ side against informant and others. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that injuries, sustained by two injured, are grievous in nature. 7. Considering the fact that injuries, sustained by most of the injured person, are simple in nature coupled with the fact that petitioners have got clean antecedent, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the petitioner nos. 1, 3 to 6, 8 & 10 to 18, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with K. Nagar P.S. Case No. 71 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 8. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. anay/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T