SANJIVAKUMAR S/O MAHADEVAPPA GURAPPANAVAR, v. VIJAYALAXMI W/O NAGARAJ GANJIGATTI,
MFA/21953/2012 · 2025-06-19
Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49825 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49825 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7791 MFA No. 21953 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 21953 OF 2012 (MV-I) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. SANJIVAKUMAR S/O MAHADEVAPPA GURAPPANAVAR, AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER OF TRACTOR, R/O: TARUR, TQ: SHIGGOAN, DIST: HAVERI.
2.
SRI. GANGADHAR S/O MARIYAPPA JAVALI, AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND OWNER OF TRACTOR, R/O: TARUR, TQ: SHIGGAON, DIST: HAVERI.
… APPELLANTS (BY SRI. K.H. BAGI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. VIJAYALAXMI W/O NAGARAJ GANJIGATTI, AGE: 23 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: GUDDADAMANI, TQ: HANAGAL, DIST: HAVERI.
2.
SMT. HANAMAVVA W/O TIMMANNA GANJIGATTI, AGE: 57 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: GUDDADAMANI, TQ: HANAGAL, DIST: HAVERI.
3.
SRI. TIMMANNA S/O. HANAMANTAPPA GANJIGATTI, AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: GUDDADAMANI, TQ: HANAGAL, DIST: HAVERI.
… RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. HARISH S. MAIGUR, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R3)
Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7791 MFA No. 21953 of 2012
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 24.02.2012 PASSED IN M.V.C. NO.26/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL MACT, HANAGAL.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR)
Learned counsel for the appellants and respondents have filed joint memo along with signatures of the appellants and respondent Nos.1 and 2 stating that the parties have settled the matter amicably and do not want to pursue the appeal. Hence, prayed to dismiss the appeal as not pressed.
Joint memo is placed on record.
The appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
The statutory deposit made by the owner shall be refunded to him.
Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE
SRA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 1