APHC010039792011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 2844/2011 Between: 1. ABDUL KAREEM, S/O MOHD. KHASIM SR.NO.30884-80 DOOR NO.5/210, SANNALAVARI VEEDHI JAWAHARPET, OPP. CHINNAPURAM HOSPITAL MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. INDIAN BANK, HEAD OFFICER, REP.BYITS CHIEF MANAGER, HRM DEPARTMENT PENSION CELL, 66, RAJAJI SALAI, CHENNAI-600 001 2. THEGENERAL MANAGER HRM, INDIAN BANK , HEAD OFFICE, HRMDEPARTMENT, CHENNAI 3. THE MANAGER, INDIAN BANK, MACHAVARAM, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the impugned order HO:HRM;PEN:30884;2010-1 dt. 29-09-2010 under which the first respondent rejected the application of the petitioner to join the pension scheme of Indian Bank as illegal, arbitrary, and without jurisdiction and issue a consequential direction to the first respondent to join the petitioner as a member of the pension scheme under Indian Bank (Employees) Pension Regulations, 1995. IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 3534 OF 2011) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned order HO:HRM:PEN:30884;2010-1 dt. 29-09-2010 pending disposal of the above WP. 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DEEPAK MISRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. AMBADIPUDI SATYANARAYANA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 2844 of 2011 ORDER: Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. It evinces that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting his case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 04.07.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Writ Petition No.2844 of 2011 Date : 04.07.2025 SPP