Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
9 I APHC010381772025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19289 OF 2025 Between:
1. Davala Adam, S/o Late Chinna Yellamanda, Aged 52 years
2. Davala Aggidora, S/o. Late Chinna Yellamanda Aged 50 years
3. Davala Hanumaiah, S/o Late Chinna Yellamanda Aged 48 years
4. Dondapati Ashok Kumar, S/o Late Subbarao Aged 50 years (All the Petitioners are residents of SC Colony, Endugumpalem village, Nadendia mandal, Palnadu district). ...Petitioners AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector and Dist Executive Magistrate, Collectorate Buildings, Narasarao Pet, Palnadu District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Narasarao Pet, Palnadu District. 4. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Narasarao Pet, Palnadu District. 5. The Inspector of Police, Chilakaluripeta Rural PS, Chilakaluripeta, Palnadu District. 6. The Sub Inspector of Police Cum SHO, Nadendia PS, Nadendia mandal, Palnadu District
7. Sri Bathina Subba Naidu, Aged about 40 Chilakaluripeta Rural, Palnadu District. 8. Sri Pulla Rao, Aged about 45 years Occ: Sub-Inspector of Police Nadendia PS, Nadendia Mandal, Palnadu District years, Occ: Cl of Police, ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order or orders, directions or a writ preferably the writ of mandamus by declaring the high-handed action of the 5th and 6th Respondents in interfering with the personal life of the Petitioners by keeping them under threat of illegal confinement by their actions of calling them to 5th Respondents PS and making the Petitioner to sit and humiliating without reason or complaint against him as illegal, arbitrary, capricious and colourable exercise of power apart from violation of Constitutional mandate of personal liberty granted under Article 21 and consequently direct the 2nd and Respondents to protect the petitioner from harassment of Respondents and take appropriate action against the Respondents 5 and 6.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 5th and 6th Respondents not to harass the Petitioner for pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI T BALASWAMI Counsel for the Respondent No. 1, 3 to 6: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: any 3rd 5th and 6th no reason. APHC010381772025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 19289/2025 Between: 1.DAVALA ADAM, S/O.LATE.CHINNA YELLAMANDA, YEARS. 2.DAVALA AGGIDORA, S/0. LATE.CHINNA YELLAMANDA AGED 50 YEARS. AGED 52 3.DAVALA HANUMAIAH, S/O.LATE CHINNA YELLAMANDA AGED 48 YEARS 4.DONDAPATI ASHOK KUMAR, S/O.LATE.SUBBARAO, AGED 50 YEARS (ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE RESIDENTS OF SC COLONY, ENDUGUMPALEM VILLAGE. NADENDLA MANDAL, DISTRICT). PALNADU ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND DIST EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE, COLLECTORATE BUILDINGS, NARASARAO PET, DISTRICT. 3.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARASARAO PET, P.ALNADU DISTRICT. PALNADU 4.THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, NARASARAO PET, PALNADU DISTRICT. 5.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHILAKALURIPETA RURAL PS, CHILAICAI.URIPETA, PALNADU DISTRICT. 6.THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE CUM SHO, NADENDLA PS, NADENDLA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT 7.SRI BATHINA SUBBA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC CL OF POLICE, CHILAKALURIPETA RURAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. 8.SR! PULL/v RAO. , .^GED ABOUT 45 YEARS OCC SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NADENDLA PS, NADENDLA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):
c 9 Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.T BALASWAMI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME 2.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for; a Writ of Mandamus declaring the high-handed action of the 5 and 6^^ Respondents in interfering with the personal life of the Petitioners by keeping them under threat of illegal confinement by their actions of calling them to 5^" Respondent’s PS and making the Petitioners to sit and humiliating without any reason or complaint against him as illegal, arbitrary, capricious and colourable exercise of power apart from violation of Constitutional mandate of personal liberty granted under Article 21 and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd Respondents to protect the petitioner from harassment of 5th and 6th Respondents and take appropriate action against the Respondents 5 and 6. ” th
2. Sri T.Balaswami, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Police are unnecessarily calling the Petitioners to the Police Station.
3. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, brought to the notice of the Court that a crime has been registered against the son of Petitioner No.3 herein and to know the whereabouts of the Accused, the Police called the Petitioners herein to the Police Station. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of and the Police are directed not to call the Petitioners to the Police Station, unless
4.
3 their presences is required for any enquiry and the Police are also directed to follow due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
SDI- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Affairs, State of AP, Principal Secretary, Department of Home Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District 2, The District Collector and Dist Executive Magistrate, Coliectorate Pet, Palnadu District.
1. The Buildings, Narasarao
3. The Superintendent of Police, Narasarao Pet, Palnadu District. 4 The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Narasarao Pet, Palnadu District. Chllakaluripeta Rural PS, Chilakaluripeta
5. The Inspector of Police Palnadu District. 6, The Sub Inspector 5 of Police Cum SHO, Nadendia PS, Nadendla Mandal, Palnadu District 7 One CC to Sri. T Balaswami Advocate [OPUC] High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
8. TwoCCsto GP for Home
9. TwoCCsto GP for Revenue Two CD Copies
10. GSC
HIGH COURT DATED;24/07/2025
ORDER WP NO. 19289 OF 2025 ^ 2 3 SEP 2025 ivi^entSectioux ^ x> rf'o DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS