Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49812 (MAD)

Fairose v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

CRL OP/11758/2025 · 2025-04-21

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.11758 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 21.04.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.11758 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.No.7830 of 2025 Fairose ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Chengam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. 2. The State by Inspector of Police, Chengam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. 3. Sudhagar ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records pertaining to Juvenile Justice Board, Tiruvannamalai in J.C.No.36 of 2023, quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Madhubala For R1 : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.11758 of 2025 This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceeding in Juvenile Justice Board, Tiruvannamalai in J.C.No.36 of 2023. 2. Pending this petition, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves. 3. A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court, which has been signed by the petitioner and the defacto complainant and also by their respective counsel. All the parties are present and identified by their respective counsel and the Police. In order to identify the respective parties, they have also produced the copies of the Aadhaar Card are made part of the record. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves. 4. Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the proceeding pending, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641-(Parbathbhai https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.11758 of 2025 Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath), this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, quashes the proceeding in Juvenile Justice Board, Tiruvannamalai in J.C.No.36 of 2023. 5. In view of the above, the proceedings in Juvenile Justice Board, Tiruvannamalai in J.C.No.36 of 2023, is hereby quashed as against the petitioner. The terms of Joint Memo of Compromise shall form part and parcel of this Order. The petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.5,000/-, (Rupees Five Thousand only) as costs, to the Chief Justice Relief Fund, Tamil Nadu, forthwith and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed. 21.04.2025 (3/3) Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order mn G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.11758 of 2025 mn To 1. The Juvenile Justice Board, Tiruvannamalai. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Chengam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. 3. The Inspector of Police, Chengam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. 4. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai. Crl.O.P.No.11758 of 2025 21.04.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis