Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49812 (AP)

Nagumanthri Sujatha Patnaik, v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/11540/2025 · 2025-05-04

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[3457 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11540 OF 2025 Between: Nagumanthri Sujatha Patnaik, W/o. Uma Maheswara Rao, Aged about 80 years, Rep. by her GPA Holoder, Gangireddia Santhosh Kumar S/o. Nookaraju, Aged about 30 years, R/o. D. No. 10-160/1 Bangaramma Gudi, Sai Nagar Colony, Pedamadaka, Aganampudi, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ...Petitioner AND State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. The Station House Officer, Duvvada Police Station, Duvvada, Visakhapatnam District. Polaki Mohan Rao, S/o. Krishna Murthy, Aged about 51 years, R/o.D No. 12-18-72, Mussapet, Chitaarama Nagar, Bala Nagar, Rangareddy District, Telangana State. 1. 2. 3. 4. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3 rd respondent in interfering with the civil disputes in order to settle property rights in favour of the 4th respondent under the guise of FIR No. 70/2025 dated 14-02- 2025 is illegal, arbitrary, ultravires and violation of Article 14 and Constitution of India and to consequently direct the respondent No.3 not to interfere petitioner's property covered by registered sale deed 4042/1970 dated 17-10-1970 in respect of land situated in an extent of 445 Sq. Yds, Plot No. 1, Sy. No. 48/3 and 48/17, Aganampudi Village, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. lA NO: 1 OF 202.4 21 of the Doc. No. Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court pleased to direct the respondent No.3 not to interfere may be with the civil dispute and property rights of the petitioner over the land situated in an extend of 445 Sq. Yds, Plot No. 1, Sy. No. 48/3 and 48/17 Aganampudi Village, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District covered by Doc.No.4042/1970 dated 17-10-1970 and vacant land tax Assessment No. 1086323452; Counsel for the PetitionerrSRI. V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: APHC010218972025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11540/2025 Between: Nagumanthri Sujatha Patnaik ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VVSATISH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT{S) 9 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION N0.1154n DF 9091; ORDER: 1. It is submitted that the petitioner is aged about 80 years and i represented by her GPA Holder and she submitted that 4*^ respondent, the 3'^^ IS at the behest of respondent had filed a complaint and is registered as a case in Crime No.70 of 2025 on the file of Duvvada Police Station, Visakhapatnam Commissionerate for the alleged offence under Section 329(3), 324(4) read with 3(5) of BNS. It is submitted that the 3^“ respondent is pressurizing the. petitioner to settle the disputes pending between the petitioner and the civil unofficial respondent. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits with the civil disputes pending between the that police are not interfering petitioner and the unofficial respondent. 3. Considering the submissions to disturb the peace of the petitioner and disputes between pending between the 3'"^ respondent is hereby directed not not to interfere with the civil the petitioner and the 4*^ respondent, without following the due -process of law. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed off. No costs As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall st sed. ASSISTANT registrar //TRUE COPY// M section officer To, 1. The Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District, State of Andhra Pradesh (BY SPECIALMESSENGER) 2. The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 3. The Station House Officer, Duvvada Police Station, Duvvada, Visakhapatnam District. Polaki Mohan Rao, S/o. Krishna Murthy, Aged about 51 years, R/o.D No. 12-18-72, Mussapet, Chitaarama Nagar, Bala Nagar, Rangareddy District, Telangana State. (Addressee Nos.2 to 4 BY RPAD) One CC to SRI. V V SATISH Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR HOME ,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Three CD Copies 4. 5. 6. 7. jr HIGH COURT DATED:05/05/2025 ORDER WP.No. 11540 of 2025 ^ 2 2 SEP 2025 , . Scctiop^^^ o» r"/ DISPOSSING THE WRIT PETITIION WITHOUT COSTS