Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49810 (BOM)

KU. AISHWARYA @ PRIYANKA SHANKAR CHAMPATI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO PS WADI DIST.NAGPUR

BA/491/2025 · 2025-06-24

Urmila Joshi Phalke

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 923 & 924.ba491.492.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO.491 OF 2025 Ku. Aishwarya @ Priyanka Shankar Champati Vs. State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Police Station, Wadi, Nagpur WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO.492 OF 2025 Mohd. Iklak Mustak Ahamad Khan Vs. State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Police Station, Wadi, Nagpur -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S. D. Chande, Counsel for the applicant through video conferencing. Mr. M. J. Khan, APP for non-applicant/State. CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED : 24/06/2025 1. The application is for grant of bail. 2. One of the ground raised in the application that there is a delay in trial. Learned APP informed that the prosecution has already closed the evidence and the matter is fixed for recording the statement. Considering the same, learned Counsel for the applicant seeks liberty to withdraw the application with directions to the trial Court to dispose of the trial within three months. 3. Considering the fact that now the prosecution evidence is already over and the case is already fixed for recording the statement of the 2025:BHC-NAG:5912 (2) 923 & 924.ba491.492.2025 accused. The trial Court can dispose of the trial within three months. 4. In view of that, the application is disposed of as withdrawn with direction that the trial Court shall dispose of the trial within three months. If the trial Court could not dispose of the trial within three months, then the applicant is at liberty to file an application before this Court. (URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.) Sarkate