KUMARSWAMY S/O. BASAYYA HIREMATH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/102301/2024 · 2025-09-09
S Vishwajith Shetty
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49809 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49809 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11667 CRL.P No. 102301 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102301 OF 2024 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
KUMARSWAMY S/O. BASAYYA HIREMATH, AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESSMAN, R/O. KEDEKOPPA VILLAGE, TQ. KUSHTAGI, KOPPAL, PIN CODE.
& PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MAHANTESH S. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH KUSHTAGI POLICE STATION, R/BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENCH, AT: DHARWAD-580 011.
& RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS C.C. NO.435/2022 REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 78(3) OF THE KARNTAKA POLICE ACT, 1963 PENDING ON THE FILE OF
RAKESH S HARIHAR Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD
BENCH
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11667 CRL.P No. 102301 of 2024
LEARNED PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KUSHTAGI IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER/ACCUSED 1 IS CONCERNED, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER IS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY)
1. Accused no.1 is before this Court under Section 482 of Cr.PC, with a prayer to quash the entire proceedings in C.C.No.435/2022 pending before the Court of Prl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Kushtagi, arising out of Crime No.13/2022 registered by Kushtagi Police Station, Koppal District, for the offence punishable under Section 78(3) of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963 (for short, 'the Act').
2. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
3.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that even before registration of FIR, raid was conducted and the articles used by the accused persons for the purpose of conducting
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11667 CRL.P No. 102301 of 2024
matka were seized under a panchanama, which is impermissible. Accordingly, he prays to allow the petition. 4. Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader has opposed the petition. 5. The material on record would go to show that on receipt of the credible information, the first informant and his staff had conducted raid to the alleged spot and had seized the money that was used for the purpose of conducting matka. The other articles which were used for conducting matka were also seized and subjected to panchanama and thereafter, the seized articles were brought to the police station and subsequently, the FIR in Crime No.13/2022 was registered for the offence punishable under Section 78(3) of the K.P.Act. Before registration of FIR, raid was conducted and the articles used by the accused persons for the purpose of conducting matka were seized under a panchanama. Therefore, the investigation in the case had commenced even prior to registration of FIR in Crime No.13/2022. - 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11667 CRL.P No. 102301 of 2024
6. Undisputedly, the alleged offence is a non-cognizable offence, and therefore, compliance of Section 155(2) of Cr.PC, becomes mandatory in the present case. The order passed under Section 155(2) of Cr.PC, is not part of the order sheet maintained by the Trial Court in the present case. The coordinate bench of this Court in the case of VAGGEPPA GURULINGA JANGALIGI VS THE STATE OF KARNATAKA - ILR 2020 KAR 630, has observed that the order passed under Section 155(2) of Cr.PC, shall form part of the order sheet in which further proceedings is required to be continued by the Trial Court. In the said case, it is also observed that the learned Magistrate while passing the order under Section 155(2) of Cr.PC shall specify the rank and designation of the police officer who is required to investigate the case. In the present case, there is no material to show that the order passed under Section 155(2) of Cr.PC, is part of the order sheet. 7.
Under the circumstances, I am of the opinion that the impugned proceedings if allowed to continue, the same would amount to abuse of process of law. Accordingly, the following
order:
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11667 CRL.P No. 102301 of 2024
8. Petition is allowed. The entire proceedings in C.C.No.435/2022 pending before the Court of Prl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Kushtagi, arising out of Crime No.13/2022 registered by Kushtagi Police Station, Koppal District, for the offence punishable under Section 78(3) of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963, as against the petitioner stands quashed.
Sd/- (S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE
KK CT:BCK LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 4