Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49805 (AP)

BALIJA NAGESWARA RAO, v. THE STATE OF A.P., REP BY PP.,

CRLRC/1216/2009 · 2025-05-05

Y Lakshmana Rao

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1216 OF 2009 Between: Balija Nageswara Rao, S/o.B.Anjineyulu, aged about 55 R/o.D.No.19-51, Mominabad, Guntakal, Anantapur District. ...Revision Petitioner/Accused No.1 years, AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. ...Respondent/Respondent Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.PC aggrieved by the Judgment dated 20.07.2009 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 120 of 2008 the file of Judge, Family Court-Cum-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Anantapur which was confirmed the conviction made in CC.No.61 of 2007 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Guntakal, Ananatapur District. on Counsel for the Petitioner :Ms.G.Anusha, representing Sri O Uday Kumar Counsel for the Respondent : Assistant Public Prosecutor The Court made the following: APHC010371602009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE IHIOMOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINALREVISIONCy\SE NO: 1216/2009 Between: Balija Nageswara FJao, ...PETITIONER AND The State of A.F’ rep by Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Petitioner: Elevated as Judge Counsel for the Respondent: Public Prosecutor ...RESPONDENT The Court made the following: ORDER: The learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Ananthapura (FAC) Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Guntakal, submitted a letter appending with the photocopy of the death certificate of the petitioner, stating that the petitioner died on 11.01.2021. mu In view of the death of the petitioner, this revision case is dismissed as 2. abated. 2 Dr., Crl.R.C.No,1216of2L'| Dated 06.05.202s is dismissed as abated. There 3. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. SD/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// i. SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Judge, Family Court-Cum-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Anantapur, Anantapur District.(With records) 2. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Guntakal, Ananatapu District. (WithTecords) ■■'r- 3. The Station, Flouse Officer, Guntakal I Town Police Station, Anantapur District. r 4. One CC to Sri O.Uday Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CC's to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT] 6. The Section Officer, Criminal section. High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 7. THREE CD Copies BSV AL HIGH COURT DATED:06/05/2025 ORDER CRLRC.No.1216 of 2009 \ 01 SEP 2025 o for DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS ABATED WITHOUT COSTS