Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49804 (RAJ)

SHADAB ALI @ SADDU S/O JAKIR ALI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12840/2025 · 2025-11-07

Chandra Prakash Shrimali

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44761] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12840/2025 Shadab Ali @ Saddu S/o Jakir Ali, Aged About 18 Years, R/o House No. 2-G-79 Gali Behind Saddam Manjil Chhatrapura Talab Vigyan Nagar Thana Vigyan Nagar Kota Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At Central Jail Kota) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Rahim Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakad, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order 07/11/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.231/2025 registered at Police Station Gumanpura, District Kota City for the offence(s) under Section(s) 310(2) & 311 of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application. [2025:RJ-JP:44761] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12840/2025] 4. Perused the material available on record and taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been filed; the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused- petitioner Shadab Ali @ Saddu S/o Jakir Ali is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. Considering the criminal antecedent(s) of the accused- petitioner, it is made clear that if he is found to be involved in offence(s) of a similar nature in future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail granted to the accused-petitioner by this Court. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J GAURAV SHARMA /86