GONUGUNTLA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA & 4 OTHERS v. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR & 2 OTHERS
WP/28958/2009 · 2025-12-02
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49801 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49801 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010591712009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 28958/2009 Between:
1. GONUGUNTLA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA & 4 OTHERS, S/O SRI GONUGUNTLA SUBBA RAO, BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.22-11-295, PEDDAPULI LANE, GUNTUR-3.
2. CHUNDURU MURALI KRISHNAMURTHY,, S/O LATE CHUNDURU VENKATA NARASIMHARAO, BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.2-11-6, LALAPET, GUNTUR-3.
3. GONUGUNTLA SRI KRISHNA,, S/O SRI GONUGUNTLA SUBBARAO, BUSINESS, R/O BRINDAVAN ENCLAVE, LAVENDER NORTH, NO.201, ETUKURU ROAD, GUNTUR-3.
4. SMT.PUJALA PADMAVATHI., W/O VENKATESHWARA RAO HOUSEWIFE, R/O 4/7. BRODIPET, GUNTUR-2.
5. TRIPURAMALLU SAMBASIVA RAO,, S/O VENKATESWARLU, RETIRED, R/O D.NO.20-8-66, VADLAMATCHAVARI STREET, SANGADIGUNTA, GUNTUR-3.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR 2 OTHERS, (FOR REGISTRATION OF ALIENATION DEEDS)
2. THE A P STATE WAKF BOARD HYDERABAD, REP./ BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.
3. THE COLLECTOR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE GUNTUR DISTRICT GUNTUR, S/O. GURUVA REDDY SOFTWARE ENGINEER R/O.
11528, FLOYD DRIVE #2410, OVERLAND PARK, KANSAS, USA
66210.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. D HANUMANTHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. SHAFATH AHMED KHAN SC-WAKF BOARD
3. SHAIK KHAJA BASHA
4. SHAFATH AHMED KHAN The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
It transpires from the record that on the last two occasions, i.e., on 19.02.2025 and 28.02.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the Petitioners. On 28.02.2025, this Court had directed the Registry to list the matter under the caption 8For Dismissal9. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the Petitioners.
2. In this view of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that the Petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case.
3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution. No
order as to costs.
4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 03.12.2025 DSV
110
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO: 28958/2009
03.12.2025
DSV
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 28958/2009 PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. No
DATE
ORDER Office Note
13. 03.12.2025 GRKP, J
Writ Petition is dismissed for Non prosecution. (vide separate order)
___________
GRKP, J DSV