PADI JAYASHANKAR REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/16919/2025 · 2025-11-18
D Ramesh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49800 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49800 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010338102025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 16919/2025 Between:
1. PADI JAYASHANKAR REDDY, S/O. LATE KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. RESIDENT OF D.NO. 3-89, NETHAJI ROAD, TIRUCHANURU, RENIGUNTA MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SRIKALAHASTHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, RENIGUNTA MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 5. THE SUBREGISTRAR, RENIGUNTA, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 6. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, TIRUPATHI. 7. K LOKESWAR REDDY, S/O. NARAYANA REDDY, D.NO. 1-49, TIRUMANYAM, RAJULA KANDRIGA POST, VADAMALA PETA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 8. R LAKSHMI SURYAVATHI SARANYA, W/O R. VENKAT ABHINAV RAO, D.NO. 6-7-595, SIRIPURAM COLONY, TIRUPATHI URBAN
2
MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT
9. R SUCHITRA, W/O. SRINIVASA RAO, D.NO. 6-7-595, SIRIPURAM COLONY, TIRUPATHI URBAN MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 10. R ANJANA SRAVANI, W/O. SANKETH RAM, D.NO. 6-7-595, SIRIPURAM COLONY, TIRUPATHI URBAN MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 11. T SUMALATHA, W/O. T. ANITHA KUMAR REDDY, D.NO. 1-1780, GANDHI NAGAR, YERRAMUKKAPALLI, KADAPA TOWN, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order, writ or direction, more particularity one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4rt respondent in mutating the revenue records on the name of un-official respondents No. 7 to 11 measuring an extent of Ac. 0.56 cents in Sy.No. 103/1C, Ac. 0.16 cents in Sy.No. 103/6A/2, Ac. 0.52 cents in Sy.No. 103/IB, Ac. 0.49 cents in Sy.No. 103/6A/1, Ac. 0.15 cents in Sy.No. 103/6B/1 and Ac. 0.52 cents in Sy.No. 103/IAof Kothapalem Village, Renigunta Mandal, Tirupathi District without following the procedure is arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional, unjust, against the principles of natural justice, contrary to the procedure envisaged under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Book Act, 1971 and the Rules made there under and consequently direct the respondent No.5 and 6 not to entertain any documents tob be submitted by the respondents Nos. 7 to 11 to the lands measuring an extent of Ac. 0.56 cents in Sy.No. 103/1C, Ac. 0.16 cents in Sy.No. 103/6A/2, Ac.
0.52 cents in Sy.No. 103/IB, Ac. 0.49 cents in Sy.No. 103/6A/1, Ac. 0.15 cents in Sy.No. 103/6B/1 and Ac. 0.52 cents in Sy.No. 103/1A of Kothapalem Village, Renigunta Mandal, Tirupathi District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to suspend the mutation effected on the name of the respondents No. 7 to 11 measuring an extent of Ac. 0.56 cents in Sy.No. 103/1C, Ac. 0.16 cents in Sy.No. 103/6A/2, Ac. 0.52 cents in Sy.No. 103/IB, Ac. 0.49 cents in
3
Sy.No. 103/6A/1, Ac. 0.15 cents in Sy.No. 103/6B/1 and Ac. 0.52 cents in Sy.No. 103/1A of Kothapalem Village, Renigunta Mandal, Tirupathi District, pending disposal of the writ petition before the Hon’ble court. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KANUKOLANU SRI SAI SANJAY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. PAWAN KUMAR MALAPATI The Court made the following:
4
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, he filed a letter in the Registry dated 14.11.2025, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. Permission as sought for is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date :19.11.2025 SCH
5
236
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
Writ Petition No.16919 of 2025 19.11.2025
SCH