Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4980 (PAT)

Satya Narayan Singh v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./79732/2025 · 2026-04-03

Chandra Shekhar Jha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79732 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2024 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Jamui ====================================================== Satya Narayan Singh Son of Ram Sakal Singh R/o Village - Akorhi, Police Station -Mohania, District - Kaimur at Bhabhua. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 6 03-04-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and apprehending his arrest in connection with Jamui Cyber P.S. Case No. 11 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of IPC and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of IT Act, 2000. 3. As per FIR unknown persons were found involved in digital arrest/ cyber fraud, where informant was forced to pay Rs. 10 lakhs after his digital address. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner was implicated Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79732 of 2025(6) dt.03-04-2026 2/3 merely on the basis of suspicion. It is submitted that till now no incriminating material surfaced against this petitioner, who is a man of clean antecedent. It is further submitted that withdrawal as reflected in bank statement is not possible as the maximum limit of withdrawal from ATM is Rs. 50,000/- 5. Taking note of nature of accusation the I.O. of this case was called for with all relevant documents in terms of order dated 18.03.2026. 6. I.O. is present in person. 7. Taking reference of the documents as supplied by I.O. of this case, Mr. Raj Kishor Singh learned APP while opposing the prayer of bail submitted that the petitioner is admittedly Managing Director of the firm namely, M/s Agrolimes Oveseas Pvt. Ltd., the alleged account is existing in name of M/s Agrolimes Oveseas Pvt. Ltd. where admittedly this petitioner is one of the Managing Director. It is submitted that taking note of suspicious transactions, the bank already closed Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79732 of 2025(6) dt.03-04-2026 3/3 the operation of bank activities as within short span of 26 days total of Rs. 3,85,55,099.01/- was credited to the account of this petitioner’s company and Rs. 3,82,24,5999/- was debited with closing balance of Rs. 3,35,000.01/- only. It is submitted that amount was received by this company basically due to cyber fraud including digital arrest. 8. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by taking note of fact as huge transaction of money was done through bank account of the company, where petitioner is Managing Director in the background of the allegation of cyber fraud/ digital arrest, accordingly, the prayer of anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected. 9. Presence of I.O. is dispensed with. Sudha/- (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) U T