Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4980 (MAD)

Ranjith Kumar v. The State of Tamil Nadu

CRL OP(MD)/17353/2025 · 2026-04-06

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP(MD). No.17353 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 06.04.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No.17353 of 2025 Ranjith Kumar ...Petitioner/Accused Vs The State Rep by The Inspector of Police NIB-CID, Madurai Crime No.13 of 2024 ..Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.J.Jeyaaron Raja For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambi Selvan Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No. 13 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / A1, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 24.11.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c)r/w. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.17353 of 2025 20(b)(ii)(c) and 29(1) of NDPS Act in Crime No.13 of 2024 on the file of the respondent seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused were found in illegal possession of 24.500kgs of ganja. Hence the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent police has registered a false case against the petitioner and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that no contraband was recovered from this petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 24.11.2024. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that petitioner along with other accused were found in illegal possession of 24.500kgs of ganja which is a commercial quantity. He would further submit that there are previous cases pending against the petitioner.. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.17353 of 2025 5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and the fact that the contraband involved in this case is commercial quantity and that previous cases are pending against the petitioner this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Hence the petition stands dismissed. (P D B J) 06.04.2026 aav To 1.The Intelligence Officer The Inspector of Police NIB-CID, Madurai 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.17353 of 2025 P. DHANABAL, J aav ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No. 17353 of 2025 Date : 06.04.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis