APHC010040662019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3527] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION NO: 1857/2019 Between: 1. CH PRABHAKARA RAO, S/O. ADINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC. JUNIOR ASSISTANT, SRI SANTHOSHIMATA AMMAVARI TEMPLE, SRIKAKULAM TOWN, SRIKAKULAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (ENDOWMENTS) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, ANDHRA PRADESH GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, SRIKAKULAM-532 001, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 5. SRI G GURUNADHA RAO, S/O. RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC. EXECUTIVE OFFICER, GRADE-II, SRI YENDLA MALLIKARJUNA SWAMY TEMPLE, RAVIVALASA, TEKKALI MANDAL, TEKKALI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 532 20 6. SRI K V RAMANA MURTHY, S/O. HARINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 57 2 HBKM,J & HAHHS,J W.P.No.1857 of 2019 YEARS, OCC. EXECUTIVE OFFICER, GRADE-II, KOTA DURGA AMMAVARI TEMPLE, PALAKONDA 532 240, PALAKONDA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. POODATTU AMARENDER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) 2. D V SASIDHAR 3 HBKM,J & HAHHS,J W.P.No.1857 of 2019 The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-II for the official respondents. 2. By virtue of the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 30.06.2025, the petitioner was promoted as Executive Officer Grade-III and he was posted to Group Temples, Mandasa-II (Consisting 10 Temples). 3. Since the relief sought in this writ petition has already been achieved through the above said proceedings of the 2nd respondent, nothing survives in this writ petition. The proceedings of the 2nd respondent shall be made as part of the Court record. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infrcutuous. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN __________________________________ JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA 16.07.2025 PGT