IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI/^^®^ ^ FRIDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 640 OF 2025 Contempt Case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971, to summon the respondents and to punish them for wilfull and intentional violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court passed in WP.No. 18391/2021 dated 28.04.2023. Between: D. Prabhakara Rao, S/o Late D.Appa Rao, Aged 63 years, Enforcement Sub-Inspector (Retd) Kuneru Check Post, Paarvathipuram, Manyam Dist. R/o D.No. 16-12-84, P.N.Colony, OppiMIG 68, VenkateswaraNagar, Srikakulam 532005 ...PETITIONER AND 1. Mukesh Kumar Meena, IAS, Principal Secretary, Revenue (Excise) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. Nisanth Kumar, I.A.S, Director, Prohibition and Excise Commissionarate 3rd Floor, IHC Corporate Building, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh 522503 ...RESPONDENTS %• Counsel for the PetitionerSRI. HARINATH REDDY SOMAGUTTA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI. G RAJU The Court made the following order: APHC010115662025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE fm [3330] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 640/2025 Between: D. Prabhakara Rao ...PETITIONER AND Mukesh Kumar Meena IAS and another Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.HARINATH REDDY SOMAGUTTA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1.G RAJU ...CONTEMNOR{S) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO. 640 of 2025 ORDER: Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the order, dated 28.04.2023 of this Court passed in W.P.No.18391 of 2021 has been complied with by the respondents. On earlier occasion also learned counsel represented the same and as there is no representation for the petitioner, this Court directed to list the matter today under caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner today also. Therefore, the Contempt Case is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any shall stand closed Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. Mukesh Kumar Meena, IAS, Principal Secretary, Revenue (Excise) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. Nisanth Kumar, I.A.S, Director, Prohibition and Excise Commissionarate 3rd Floor, IHC Corporate Building, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh 522503 3. One CC to SRI. HARINATH REDDY SOMAGUTTA, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI. G RAJU, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Three CD Copies nm HIGH COURT DATED:02/05/2025 % ORDER 1 fi AUG 20?5 X U) i,p s- Current Section ^ ^spatch^5-^ CC.No.640 of 2025 DIMISSING THE CONTEMPT CASE FOR NON-PROSECUTION