APHC010168962024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8459/2024 Between: 1. BOLLEDU ANIL KUMAR, S/O. JOJI, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 5-297, MUGGU ROAD, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522501. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, SUB DIVISION, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , TADEPALLIPOIICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NALLANAGULA LALITHA SREE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, aggrieved by the action of the respondents in issuing impugned proceedings vide C. No 07/BCs/SDPO-NORTH/2023 dated 05.07.2023 for opening the Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner duly violating the Police Standing Orders No. 742 and procedure laid down by the Honble High Court of Andhra Pradesh in the case of B SATYANARAYANA REDDY V/S STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Citation SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, HYDERABAD 2003 LawSuit(AP) 1477 and PUTTAGUNTA 2 PASI ALIAS PENTA PASI V/S COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Date of Decision 04 February 1998 Citation 1998 Law Suit(AP) 56.and direct the respondent uthorities to suspend the impugned proceedings of the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Guntur District, vide C. No. 07/BCs/SDPO-NORTH/2023 dated 05.07.2023 of ROWDY SHEET as otherwise it is in violation of the fundamental rights of the petitioner under of Articles 14,16,19 and 21 of Constitution of India” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that no cases are pending against the petitioner. It is further stated that, to curb and curtail the unlawful activities of the Petitioner in the vicinity, rowdy sheet was opened against the Petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, the cases registered against the Petitioner were ended in acquittal and no cases are pending against him. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned Rowdy Sheet opened against the petitioner vide proceedings in C.No.07/BCs/SDPO-NORTH/2023, dated 05.07.2023, is hereby set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:25.09.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.8459 of 2024 Dt.25.09.2025 Asr