[2025:RJ-JP:48043] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14439/2025 Bishan Sharma S/o Late Sh. Nanak Chand Sharma, R/o House No. A-280, Ground Floor, Majlis Park, Near Shiv Mandir, Adarsh Nagar, Azadpur, North-West District, New Delhi 110033. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nikhil Malhotra with Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Kailash, ASI (IO), present in person HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 26/11/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 0511/2023 registered at Police Station Kotwali Baran District Baran for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 407 & 120-B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is a commission agent. It is further submitted that the applicant has no connection with the present FIR and has been falsely implicated in the matter. It is also submitted that the applicant works on a 6 per cent commission basis. Learned counsel has relied upon the order dated 17.11.2025 passed in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 14407/2025 titled Imran Khan @ Timkala vs. State of Rajasthan, wherein [2025:RJ-JP:48043] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14439/2025] regular bail was granted to the co-accused Imran Khan. It is further submitted that the applicant has joined the investigation and that the matter is triable by a Magistrate. 3. The Investigating Officer has marked his attendance and submitted that, in the present matter, notices under Sections 91 and 41A of the Cr.P.C. were issued repeatedly; however, the same were not complied with. It is further submitted that the applicant did not mark his attendance in response to the said notices. It is also submitted that there has been deliberate ignorance of the notices, despite the fact that the applicant was granted regular bail after remaining in custody for six months. It is further submitted that 12 tonnes of material was transported from Baran to Hyderabad, which the applicant had purchased from New Sabzi Mandi, Azadpur, Delhi, and that the applicant acted in collusion with the co-accused. 4. Having heard the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, and taking note of the fact that there has been deliberate ignorance of the notices on part of the applicant, despite the fact that the applicant was granted regular bail after remaining in custody for six months, this Court is not inclined to allow the instant bail application. 5. Accordingly, the instant bail application filed under Section 482 BNSS is dismissed at this Stage. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/352