Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49781 (CHH)

Rikhiram Yadav v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2298/2022 · 2025-04-29

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:19757 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2298 of 2022 1 - Rikhiram Yadav S/o Cheruram Yadav Aged About 48 Years Resident Of Ward No. 11, Subhash Chowk , Gariyaband , Tahsil And District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Gariyaband District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Tahsildar Gariyaband , District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For State/Respondent/s. : Ms. Upasana Mehta, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 30/04/2025 1. Heard Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. Upasana Mehta, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State/respondent/s. RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.05.06 18:54:37 +0530 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that instant writ petition has been filed only for a direction to the respondents for clearance of all undisputed and admitted facts of the petitioner in respect of land in question as the same is pending before the concerned authorities. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that subject to due verification and scrutiny of the claim of the petitioner, appropriate steps shall be taken at the earliest within a stipulated period. 4. Given the statement made by the counsel for the respondent- State and since the petition has been filed instant petition upon issuance of notice regarding encroachment for which the petitioner has already filed reply. The concerned authorities are directed to consider the reply and to pass appropriate orders by affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within an outer limit of 60 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid observation(s) and direction(s), the present petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi