APHC010280482021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16360/2021 Between: 1. BUDDHA JAYALAKSHMI, W/O. RAMA KRISHNA, AGED 44 YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD, R/O. D.NO. 1542-36, SATAKAMAPATTU VEEDHI, VENKANNAKOTTU JUNCTION, GAVARAPALEM, ANAKAPALLE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISHAKAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISHAKAPATNAM CITY. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANAKAPALLE TOWN POLICE STATION, VISHAKAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. YELLAPU CHAKRAVARTHY, S/O. VENKATRAO, AGED 41 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 15-12-38, SATAKAMAPATTU VEEDHI, VENKANNAKOTTU JUNCTION, GAVARAPALEM, ANAKAPALLE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. KONATHALA SESHU BABU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED 46 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 17-4- 5, KONATHALA CHINNAYYA GARI STREET, GAVARAPALEM, ANAKAPALLE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 7. RAPETI KANNA KUMAR, S/O. PEDDA SATYANARAYANA, AGED 40 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. THUMMAPALA, GAVARAPETA, ANAKAPALLE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 8. KANDREGULA NOOKARAJU, S/O. APPARAO, AGED 35 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. P. T. NAIDU STREET, GAVARAPALEM, ANAKAPALLE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. E VENKATA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents No. 2 to 4 in considering the representation dated 02.12.2019 submitted by the Petitioner in the SPANDANA PROGRAMME for necessary action against the Respondent Nos. 5 to 8 who are harassing the Petitioner illegally by cheating the Petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to the settled principles of law and consequently direct the Respondents No. 2 to 4 to take necessary action against the Respondents No. 5 to 8.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the disputes between the parties are purely civil in nature. 3. For ready reference, the written instructions are extracted hereunder: “I also submit that I have personally informed the Respondent/Petitioner that the issue is purely civil in nature and she also executed the GPA, the police have no jurisdiction to interfere into the issue and accordingly advised her to approach the Court of law for Justice.” 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:23.09.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.16360 of 2021 Dt.23.09.2025 Asr