$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 7512/2025 KRISHNA KUMAR GUPTA AND ANR .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for the State with SI Reena P.S. Prashant Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 31.10.2025 CRL.M.A. 32141/2025 (under Section 528 B.N.S.S. on behalf of the Petitioner seeking Modification of Order dated 17.10.2025) 1. An Application has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner seeking modification of Order dated 17.10.2025 as there are typographical error in mentioning that the Order under challenge is dated 06.08.2025, when in fact the Order of the Revisional Court is dated 10.09.2025. 2. It is further recorded that the Complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C along with 156(3) Cr.P.C has been dismissed when the Complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C is still pending. 3. Submissions heard and record perused. 4. In the impugned Order dated 17.10.2025 it has been correctly recorded that the Petition had been filed to challenge the Order dated 06.08.2025 of the learned JMFC. It is hereby clarified that this Order was This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/11/2025 at 11:30:12 challenged by way of Revision which was denied vide Order dated 10.09.2025, as is mentioned in this Order itself. 5. It is hereby clarified that the said Order in fact was against the Order of 10.09.2025 whereby the Order dated 06.08.2025 by learned JMFC has been upheld. 6. Secondly, it has been recorded that the Complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C has been dismissed. However, it is erroneous submission as it has been mentioned that the Application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C that was filed along with the Complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C, had been dismissed by the learned JMFC vide Order dated 06.08.2025 which has been upheld by the Revisional Court vide Order 10.09.2025. It has been further recorded that the pre-summoning evidence has been led by the Petitioners and the matter is pending for final arguments. The Order does not record that the Complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C, stands dismissed. 7. With these observations, the Application is disposed of. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J OCTOBER 31, 2025/va This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/11/2025 at 11:30:12