[2025:RJ-JP:49147] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4604/2025 Smt. Beena W/o Shri Sohan Lal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Lapawali, P.s. Balaghat, District Karauli ( Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Superintendent Of Police, Karauli. 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Balghat, District Karauli. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohammed Rahil Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 03/12/2025 1. By way of filing the instant petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the Investigating Agency for expeditious, proper and fair investigation in FIR No.81/2025 registered with the Police Station Balghat, Karauli under Section 140(3) BNS. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the husband of the petitioner was abducted by the accused persons for which the instant FIR has been lodged on 10.04.2025. However, in- spite of passing of considerable time, till date no serious steps or efforts have been made to recover him and apprehend the accused persons who have committed the incident. Hence, the [2025:RJ-JP:49147] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-4604/2025] petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing the instant petition seeking aforesaid directions. 3. This Court vide order dated 24.11.2025 directed the Public Prosecutor to get the status report of investigation conducted so far. 4. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, factual report has been submitted, which indicates that the Police is still trying to trace the abducted victim and a team has been constituted for this purpose. 5. This Court is not satisfied with the investigation conducted so far. The incident has occurred in the month of November, 2024 and the FIR has been registered in the month of April, 2025. Sufficient time has passed, but till date no serious action has been taken by the Investigating Agency to come to a definite conclusion and submission of the report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. before the concerned Court. 6. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant petition with the following directions: “1. The Investigation Officer is directed to make speedy, fair, proper and impartial investigation and make all possible endeavours to recover the victim and apprehend the alleged accused and submit the report before the competent Court of Law. 2. The Superintendent of Police is directed to monitor the investigation on monthly basis. 3. Even if the petitioner feels aggrieved by any action of the Investigating Officer, she would be at liberty to move application under Section 200 [2025:RJ-JP:49147] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-4604/2025] Cr.P.C. before the concerned Court in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State Of U.P. And Others reported in 2008 (2) SCC 409.” 7. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/18