1 2025:CGHC:47206 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4905 of 2025 Ashish Gupta S/o Shri Bhola Sao Aged About 25 Years R/o Village- Kapildevpur, Gram Panchayat- Kapildevpur, P.S.- Chalgali, Tahsil- Balrampur, Distt.- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Secretary Department Of Forest Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector Balrampur Distt.- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 4 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Balrampur Distt.- Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) 5 - The Tahsildar Balrampur, Distt.- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 6 - Divisional Forest Officer Balrampur Distt.- Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) 7 - Gram Panchayat Kapildevpur Through The Secretary Gram Panchayat- Kapildevpur, Tahsil- Balrampur, Distt.- Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. AN Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent-State : Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, PL ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 15.09.2025 1. This writ petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs: “10. RELIEF(S) SOUGHT: 10.1 That, this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider and decide the claim of petitioner for grant of patta of the subject land bearing compartment no. P-185, rakba 0.50 hectare situated at village -Kapildevpur, Tahsil- Balrampur (C.G) as early as possible. 10.2 Any other relief or reliefs may also be granted to the petitioner which this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that this writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the concerned respondent-authority to consider and decide the pending claim of petitioner for grant of patta of the subject land, within any specified time frame in accordance with law/rules. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State submits that he is having no objection to the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3 5. Considering facts of the case, nature of relief, submissions of counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of at this stage directing the concerned respondent-authority to consider and decide the pending claim of petitioner with regard to grant of patta of the subject land, expeditiously in accordance with relevant rule/law/regulation. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. CC as per rules. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge J/-