Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49772 (PNJ)

VIKASH KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR

CRM-M/22475/2025 · 2025-07-09

Manjari Nehru Kaul

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 327 VIKASH KUMAR STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) 1. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 dated 07.11.2024 under Sections 308(2) of the BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Cyber Crime, District Panipat, along proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 28.02.2025 (Annexure P- 2. directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on 28.05.2025 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between them. 3. Ist Class, Panipat factum of the compr confirmed. As IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM- Date of decision: VIKASH KUMAR Versus HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Parvinder Moar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Karan Sharma, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Ajay Singh Kalsan, Advocate for respondent No.2. MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the instant petition Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for quashing of dated 07.11.2024 under Sections 308(2) of the BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Cyber Crime, District Panipat, along proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 28.02.2025 -2). Vide order dated 29.04.2025 of this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on .2025 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between them. Report has since been received from learned Judicial Magistrate Panipat, in pursuance of the directions of this Court, wherein the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified and As per the report, compromise IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -M-22475-2025 Date of decision: July 09, 2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Karan Sharma, DAG, Haryana. , Advocate Prayer in the instant petition filed under Section 528 of is for quashing of FIR No.0191 dated 07.11.2024 under Sections 308(2) of the BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Cyber Crime, District Panipat, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 28.02.2025 .2025 of this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on .2025 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise Report has since been received from learned Judicial Magistrate , in pursuance of the directions of this Court, wherein the omise arrived at between the parties stands verified and compromise has indeed been effected ...Petitioner ...Respondents filed under Section 528 of FIR No.0191 dated 07.11.2024 under Sections 308(2) of the BNS, 2023 registered at with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 28.02.2025 .2025 of this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on .2025 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise Report has since been received from learned Judicial Magistrate , in pursuance of the directions of this Court, wherein the omise arrived at between the parties stands verified and effected Jaspreet Kaur 2025.07.09 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-22475 between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free that he would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused quashed. 4. original, along with its report. 5. Deputy Superintendent of Police (HQ), State in the Registry of this Court exceptions. accused other than the petitioner and respondent No.2 person in the FIR in question. 6. principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303 Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed. 7. compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. July 09, 2025 Jaspreet Kaur 22475-2025 between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will, and the complainant has also made statement to the effect would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in original, along with its report. Learned State counsel has filed Deputy Superintendent of Police (HQ), Panipat Registry of this Court, which is taken on record subject to all just Learned State counsel too sub accused other than the petitioner and respondent No.2 person in the FIR in question. In view of the report of the learned trial Court, and the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2- between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out also made statement to the effect would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioner is The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in d State counsel has filed reply by way of affidavit of the Panipat on behalf of the respondent- , which is taken on record subject to all just Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioner and respondent No.2 is the only aggrieved In view of the report of the learned trial Court, and the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of , and also by the Full Bench of this Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, , the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out also made statement to the effect petitioner is The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in by way of affidavit of the - , which is taken on record subject to all just mits that there are no other the only aggrieved In view of the report of the learned trial Court, and the ngh Vs. State of , and also by the Full Bench of this Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, , the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of Jaspreet Kaur 2025.07.09 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh