Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:47180-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4893 of 2025 1 - Dukhuram Baiswade S/o Radheshyam Baiswade Aged About 52 Years Posted As Computer Operator, Adim Jati Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Nargoda, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Sandeep Yadav S/o Ashok Yadav Aged About 45 Years Posted As Computer Operator, Adim Jati Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Sakri, District- Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Cooperative Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited Through Its Managing Director, Head Office, C.B.D. Sector-21, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Registrar Cooperative Societies, Indravati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Chief Executive Officer District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - The Collector Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 - The District Marketing Officer Korba, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 7 - The Assistant Registrar Cooperative Societies, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2025.09.16 10:32:01 +0530
2 For Petitioners : Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Government Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Advocate Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Shri Bibhu Datta Guru,
Judge
Order
on Board
Per
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
15.09.2025 1 Heard Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State and Mr. Animesh Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2. 2 The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following relief(s):-
“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned notice/ tender dated 11.04.2025, 19.06.2025, 29.07.2025 & 19.08.2025 (Annexure P/1) so far it relates to the recruitment on the post of Data Entry Operator for the place where the petitioner is working. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider the claim of petitioner for regularization,
expeditiously
adopting
3 humanitarian approach, sympathetically, considering that the petitioner while continuing service has crossed maximum age as prescribed under the service rules of the State Government. 10.3 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given.” 3
Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 has pointed out that the petitioners are employees of the Tribal Service Cooperative Society, but the said Society has not been made a party respondent. 4 In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action after properly impleading the Tribal Service Cooperative Society as a necessary party respondent. 5
Learned counsel appearing for the State as well as learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 have no objection to the said submission. 6 Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioners.
4 7 Let the certified copies of the impugned annexures be returned to
learned counsel for the petitioners after retaining photocopies of the same on record. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru)
(Ramesh Sinha)
Judge Chief Justice Anu