Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49771 (ALL)

SAHIM ALAM ALIAS MUAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/15313/2025 · 2025-05-08

Sanjay Kumar Pachori

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:75374 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 15313 of 2025 Applicant :- Sahim Alam Alias Muar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sandeep Kumar Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. Sri Ashish Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri R.K. Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State are present. The present application under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the applicant to quash the order dated 8.12.2015 in Session Trial No. 1422 of 2014 (State Vs. Sahim Alam and another), arising out of case crime No. 338 of 2014, under Sections 489B and 489C, I.P.C., Police Station Bhrampuri, District Meerut, pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 3, Meerut, whereby Non Bailable Warrant has been issued against the applicant. Delay in filing the present application is explained. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was on bail at the time of issuing of Non-Bailable Warrant. It is further submitted that the applicant is very poor person and has no criminal history except the present case. It is further submitted that the applicant is resident of State of Bihar. It is further submitted that impugned order has been passed without satisfying itself that the summon and other process for attendance has been served. It is further submitted that the impugned order has been passed without considering the position of law. It is settled position of law that N.B.W. should be issued as a last resort after the litigant fails to respond the notices/summons and bailable warrant. It is further submitted that non-bailable warrant has been issued without issuing any summon and bailable warrant. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the application. Considering submissions of learned counsel and perusing record, the instant application under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is finally disposed of with a direction that in case applicant appears before the court below within three weeks from today and applies for bail/recall of non bailable warrant, his application shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another 2022 (11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director 2021 SCC Online SC 941. For a period of three weeks from today or till applicant appears before the court below, whichever is earlier, execution of non bailable warrant against applicant shall be kept in abeyance. Order Date :- 9.5.2025 T. Sinha Digitally signed by :- TRIPTI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad