1 2025:CGHC:19761 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4875 of 2023 1 - M/s Sadhna Construction Through Its Proprietor Rakesh Kumar Mishra, S/o Late Shri Awadhnath Mishra, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Choubey Colony, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Water Resources Department Mantralaya Capital Complex, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Police Station Rakhi, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Engineer-In-Chief Water Resources Department Shivnath Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Executive Engineer Water Resources Division No. 01, Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Bhaskar Payashi, Advocate For State/Respondent/s : Mr. Praveen Das, Dy. Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 30/04/2025 1. Heard Mr. Bhaskar Payashi, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Praveen Das, learned Dy. Advocate General for the State/respondent/s. RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.05.06 18:54:36 +0530 2 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant writ petition has been filed only for a direction to the respondents for clearance of all undisputed and admitted dues of the petitioner in respect of the work executed by the petitioner, as the funds are available for disbursement and also prayed for liberty to file fresh petition regarding his grievances, in case exigency arises. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that subject to due verification and scrutiny of the claim of the petitioner, appropriate steps shall be taken at the earliest within a stipulated period. 4. In view of the above submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition, at this juncture, is disposed of directing the respondent-State to ensure the payment of the undisputed and admitted dues of the petitioner in respect of the work executed by the petitioner within an outer limit of 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Further, in case exigency arises, the petitioner is at liberty to file fresh petition regarding his grievances. 5. With the aforesaid observation(s) and direction(s), the present petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi