SANTOSHA S/O. LATE GOPAL v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/100730/2025 · 2025-06-24
Venkatesh Naik T
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49765 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49765 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7985 CRL.P No. 100730 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100730 OF 2025 (439 OF Cr.PC/483 OF BNSS)
BETWEEN:
SANTOSHA S/O. LATE GOPAL, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: TAILOR, R/O. NEAR MADDANASWAMY MUTT, BALLARI. &PETITIONER (BY SHRI B. ANWAR BASHA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, (THROUGH BRUCEPETE P.S. BALLARI), REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT: DHARWAD-580001. &RESPONDENT (BY SHRI JAIRAM SIDDI, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S.439 OF CR.P.C.
(483 OF BNSS), SEEKING TO ALLOW THIS PETITION AND ENLARGE THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 ON BAIL IN S.C NO.44/2024 IN CONNECTION WITH CR.NO.34/2024 REGISTERED IN BRUCEPETE POLICE STATION BALLARI FOR THE OFFENCES U/S.302 OF IPC, PENDING TRAIL OF THE CASE BEFORE I ST ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BALLARI, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7985 CRL.P No. 100730 of 2025
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T)
Learned counsel for the petitioner as filed a memo for withdrawal of the petition. The contents of the memo are as under: <Herein the counsel for the petitioner humbly submits as under, the above said petition is withdrawn by not preferring the same, and petitioner seeks liberty to file the fresh petition after examination of CW.12 to 16. Hence this memo.=
In view of the memo and supporting submission, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty as sought for is granted. It is made clear that the petitioner is at liberty to file similar bail petition only after examination of principal / material witnesses such as CWs.11 to 16 and 18 to 21.
Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE Rsh /ct-an List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33