Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49760 (RAJ)

IQBAL S/O JABBAR KHAN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12583/2025 · 2025-11-10

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:45060] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12583/2025 1. Iqbal S/o Jabbar Khan, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Village Thalchana, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present In Sub Jail Kaman, Deeg). 2. Sabbir S/o Jabbar Khan, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Village Thalchana, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present In Sub Jail Kaman, Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13456/2025 Aas Mohammad @ Aasu Son Of Chhotalli, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Village Bamanwadi, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present In Sub Jail Kaman, Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 10/11/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.361/2025 registered at Police Station Kaman, District-Deeg for offences under Sections 189(2) and 109(1) of BNS. [2025:RJ-JP:45060] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-12583/2025] 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submits that the names of the petitioners have not been mentioned in the FIR, and no specific act has been attributed to them. It is further submitted that the injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature. Petitioners are behind the bars since 08.09.2025 and have no criminal antecedents except Aas Mohammad @ Aasu having one case. He submits that no custodial interrogation of the petitioners is required. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the cases, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the cases, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Iqbal S/o Jabbar Khan, Sabbir S/o Jabbar Khan and Aas Mohammad @ Aasu Son Of Chhotalli shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial [2025:RJ-JP:45060] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-12583/2025] court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/122-123