APHC010188572024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 858/2024 Between: 1. RATNAGIRI JABEEN TAJ @ FATHIMA BEE, W/O. LATE MASTHAN SAB, AGED 57 YEARS, R/O. THADIGOLLA VILLAGE AND POST, SREENIVASAPURAM TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE. 2. SHAIK @ RATNAGIRI URMATH BEE,, W/O. MURASHA, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O. KOSUVARIPALLE VILLAGE AND POST, THAMBALLAPALLE MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. RATNAGIRI SALEEMA BEE, , W/O. LATE MABU SAHEB AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. GOLLAPALLE VILLAGE AND POST, B. KOTHAKOTA MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KADAPA DISTRICT. RESPONDENT/ PLAINTIFF 2. RATNAGIRI VALLI SAHEB, S/O. LATE GAFFOR SAHEB, AGED 66 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.LV-29-A-24-C, INDIRA NAGAR, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT ERSTWHILE KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toBeing aggrieved by the Order and Decree dt. 21.03.2024 passed in VS,J CRP No.858 of 2024 2 I.A.No. 17 of 2024 in O.S.No. 293 of 2017 on the file of the court of Learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Madanapalle, IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S. No. 293 of 2017 on the file of the court of Learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Madanapalle, pending disposal of the main CRP and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. DIVYATHEJA GADIKOTA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. J U M V PRASAD VS,J CRP No.858 of 2024 3 The Court made the following Order: When the matter is taken up today, Mr. N Krishna Sai, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Civil Revision Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in this Civil Revision Petition, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date:26.09.2025 Ksj