RANJEET SINGH SARANGDEVOT SON OF SHRI MOHABBAT SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/17366/2025 · 2025-11-13
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49759 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49759 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:45793] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17366/2025
1. Ranjeet Singh Sarangdevot Son Of Shri Mohabbat Singh, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of House No. 24, Shobhaji Ka Gudha, Village Kanor, Udaipur, (Raj.).
2. Jairoopa Ram Choudhary Son Of Shri Bala Ram Choudhary, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Village Bhadrai, Post Kothala, Barmer, (Raj.).
3. Jagdeesh Chandra Choudhary Son Of Shri Prem Prakash Choudhary, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of Gurjar Bhawan, Mahaveer Nagar, Village Post Chohtan, District Barmer (Raj.).
4. Gorkha Ram Choudhary Son Of Shri Dama Ram Choudhary, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of Shastri Niwas, Shastri Nagar, Barmer, (Raj.).
5. Bharat Kumar Son Of Shri Bhogi Lal Jain, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of Old Bus Stand, Aspur, Dungarpur, (Raj.).
6. Narpat Singh Chouhan Son Of Shri Shambhu Singh, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 29, House No. F-7, Housing Board, Ashok Nagar, Dungarpur, (Raj.).
7. Dileep Singh Rathore Son Of Shri Sardar Singh Rathore, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of Mukam Post Jogiwara, Tehsil Sabla, District Dungarpur, (Raj.).
8. Abishek Vyas Son Of Shri Suresh Chandra Vyas, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Village Kherwara District Udaipur, (Raj.).
9. Suresh Kumhaar Son Of Shri Basant Lal Kumhaar, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 11, Gayatri Chouk, Mukam Post Simalwara, District Dungarpur, (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Medial And Health And Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. The Director, Medical And Health Services, Directorate, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. The Additional Director, (Administration), Medical And
[2025:RJ-JP:45793] (2 of 4) [CW-17366/2025] Health Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
4. The Mission Director (Nhm), Directorate Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
5. The Additional Mission Director (Nhm), Directorate Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
6. The Project Director (Nhm), Directorate Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
7. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Udaipur (Raj.)
8. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Barmer (Raj.)
9. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Dungarpur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 13/11/2025
1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer:
“It is, therefore, requested that Your Lordship would be pleased to accept and allow petition by issuing appropriate writ, order or direction Quash and this writ and an set aside the action of the respondents in reducing the number of posts of Nurse Grade-11 (GNM) from 6172 to 3704, being arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and Direct the respondents to consider and fill up all 6172 posts of Nurse Grade-II (GNM) as advertised 08.08.2007, including the remaining 2500 posts
[2025:RJ-JP:45793] (3 of 4) [CW-17366/2025] which were arbitrarily reduced, and Direct the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioners, who are duly qualified and had participated in counselling, for appointment against the posts of Nurse Grade-II (GNM), strictly in accordance with law or may kindly be pleased to decide the writ petition in the light of case of D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 414/2019, titled as State of Raj. and Ors. Versus Suresh Kumar and Ors. decided on 15.09.2025 by Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court Jaodhpur in the larger interest of justice. ii. Any other order direction which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper looking to the facts and circumstances may also kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners. iii. Cost of writ petition also may kindly be awarded in favour of petitioners.”
2.
Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 19.12.2018 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14497/2017 Suresh Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur and judgment is approved by Hon’ble Division Bench in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.414/2019 State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Suresh Kumar and Ors. on 15.09.2025. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with
judgment dated 19.12.2018 and affirmed on 15.09.2025.
3. Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC accepts notice.
4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ
[2025:RJ-JP:45793] (4 of 4) [CW-17366/2025] petition may be disposed of in light of judgment dated 19.12.2018 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14497/2017 and partly modified on dated 15.09.2025 in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.414/2019 by Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur.
5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of judgment referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/113