IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (126) CRM-M-22492-2025 Decided on : 29.04.2025 Lalit Garg ……Petitioner(s) Versus Dinesh Tyagi ……Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Munish Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner (s). ***** Sumeet Goel (Oral): 1. The substantive prayer made in the petition in hand reads thus:- “It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that the directions may kindly be issued to the Ld. Additional District & Sessions Judge-II, Faridabad to decide the criminal appeal vide CRA-231 of 2024, dated 20.08.2024 (P-2) titled as Lalit Garg Vs. Dinesh Tyagi in Complaint No.5999-2017 dated 30.11.2017 titled as Dinesh Tyagi Vs. Lalit Garg as (P-1) expeditiously.” 2. Keeping in view the nature of the prayer made and the controversy involved in the petition, this Court deems it appropriate to not call upon the respondent at this stage. 3. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and upon perusal of the record, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the Appellate Court to decide the appeal pending before it within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. Disposed of accordingly. (SUMEET GOEL) April 29, 2025 JUDGE Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No NAVEEN NAGPAL 2025.04.29 13:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh