- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7958 WP No. 101722 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 101722 OF 2025 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: MAHANTESH S/O. SIDDALINGAYYA HIREMATH, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, CHIEF PROMOTER, PROPOSED SHRI VEERANAND VIVIDODESH PRATHMIK GRAMEEN KRUSHI SAHAKARI SANGH NIYAMIT, DHAVALESHWAR, TQ: MUDALAGI, DIST: BELAGAVI-587116. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SANJANA S. MUDHOL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, BAILHONGAL, SUB-DIVISION, BAILHONGAL, AT: BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI-591101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MALA B. BHUTE, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING 1. TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 12/11/2024 IN NO. AR- 10/RSR/ /2024-25 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-B. VIJAYALAKSHMI M KANKUPPI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7958 WP No. 101722 of 2025 2. TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO GRANT PERMISSION TO FLOATING OF THE SHARE AMOUNT FOR PRE-REGISTRATION OF THE SOCIETY IN THE NAME OF THE PROPOSED SHRI. VEERANAND VIVIDODESH PRATHMIK GRAMEEN KRUSHI SAHAKARI SANGH NIYAMIT, DHAVALESHWAR, TQ: MUDALAGI, DIST: BELAGAVI, BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Miss.Sanjana S. Mudhol and the learned AGA for the respondents-State. 2. The petitioner is an agriculturist and permanent resident of Dhavaleshwar village, Nippani taluk, district Belagavi. He was not enrolled as member of any of the primary Co-operative Societies. The petitioner and other similarly situated farmers have called for a Gram Sabha meeting at Dhavaleshwar village to address their grievances and problems suffered by the farmers in the village and therefore, decided to form a society in the name of Proposed Shri Veeranand Vividodesh Prathmik Grameen Krushi - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7958 WP No. 101722 of 2025 Sahakari Sangh Niyamit, Dhavaleshwar, taluk Mudalagi to the welfare of the farmers in the village. 3. In view of the same, the petitioner submitted a proposal to the respondent No.2 seeking for grant of permission for floating the share collection from the eligible farmers for registration of the Co-operative Society in the name of Proposed Shri Veeranand Vividodesh Prathmik Grameen Krushi Sahakari Sangh Niyamit, Dhavaleshwar, taluk Mudalagi. Respondent No.2 sent a letter to the Co-operative Inspector requesting him to submit a report regarding economic viability of the proposed society without hearing the petitioner or notifying the petitioner. The Co- operative Inspector submitted a report which was also without notice and knowledge of the petitioner and based on the said report, respondent No.2 without hearing the petitioner passed the impugned order rejecting the proposal for grant of floating of the share collection to the proposed formation of the society by order dated 12.11.2024, which is impugned herein. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7958 WP No. 101722 of 2025 4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that respondent No.2 has rejected the proposal for floating of the share collection only on the reason that it is not viable and there could be overlapping of the society, that there are already other existing societies registered in the same area. Therefore, the question of the present society being successful for overlapping other Co-operative Societies already existing with the same qualities is against the guidelines prescribed by NABARD. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the said reasoning provided by respondent No.2 is arbitrary, illegal and unsustainable. It is without application of judicial mind. There is no such requirement forthcoming under the Act or the Rules for permitting floating of shares as what is opined by the respondent. Whether there is a chance of success of Co-operative Society and economic viability is the requirement to be considered and no application of mind has been applied by the respondent while passing the impugned order and without even hearing and notifying the petitioner - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7958 WP No. 101722 of 2025 has out rightly rejected the proposal for floating of share collection for formation of the society. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the judgment of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.No.100493/2024 dated 06.02.2024 wherein in similar matter on similar grounds the assistant registrar of Co- operative Societies has rejected the application without giving an opportunity to the petitioner to satisfy the requirement and chances of success and viability. The writ petition came to be allowed. Another judgment has been also relied by the learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P.No.104197/2021 which also goes in favour of the petitioner for the reason that while considering the application for economic viability and success of the floating of shares, the respondent may not look into the existence of societies or viability of the other Co-operative Societies. It is only on the basis of information furnished by the promoters that the Registrar is required to be satisfied on the proposed floating of shares by the Society to have reasonable chance of success and economic viability that is required to be - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7958 WP No. 101722 of 2025 satisfied which has to be considered by the Registrar, which has not been done in the present case. 7. Also it is not the case of the respondent that there are other rival Co-operative Societies which have filed any complaint or objection to the floating of shares of the present petitioner or formation of the societies. Under these circumstances, there is force in the argument put forth by the learned counsel for the petitioner and is appreciated by this Court for allowing the petition. Hence, the petition is required to be allowed. Accordingly, I pass the following order: ORDER i. Petition is allowed. ii. The impugned order dated 12.11.2024 in No.AR-10/RSR/ /2024-25 passed by respondent No.2 vide Annexure-B is hereby quashed. iii. The respondent is directed to collect the share amount for floating of the shares of society for registration subject to the petitioner satisfying other - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7958 WP No. 101722 of 2025 requirements of the law and provide an opportunity to the petitioner before passing any such orders. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE KGK CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 68