Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49753 (CHH)

NEETU SINGH YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5737/2025 · 2025-07-10

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5737 of 2025 1 - Neetu Singh Yadav W/o Shri Sanjay Kumar Singh Aged About 43 Years Presently Posted As Lecturer, At Sages, Keshavpur, Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instructions (D.P.I) Through Its Director, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Collector District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Joint Director Division Surguja, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 5 - District Education Officer District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice R avindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 11/07/2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition challenging the order dated 12.06.2025, issued by the Directorate of Public Instructions, Naya Raipur, whereby the petitioner, who is a Lecturer (LB) in VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.09.15 17:57:22 +0530 2 Chemistry subject and presently posted at SAGES, Keshavpur, Ambikapur, District Surguja has been posted to Govt. Higher Secondary School, Toyanar, Bijapur. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted a Committee headed by the Director, Public Instructions, vide notification dated 08.07.2025 for redressal of the such type of grievances. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move a representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 08.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 08.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to move/pursue her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 08.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits, in accordance with law as early as possible, in objective manner, by passing a reasoned order. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved