Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49752 (AP)

Sigurapati Venkata Ramana Muthy v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/9581/2020 · 2025-09-16

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010154752020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 9581/2020 Between: 1. SIGURAPATI VENKATA RAMANA MUTHY, S/O. SUBBAIAH AGED 52 YEARS, OCC.CULTIATION, LAMPAKALOVA, PRATHIPADU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. TAHSILDAR, PRATHIPADU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.9581 of 2020 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in interfering with the assigned land of the petitioner for the purpose of granting house sites under the Navaratnalu-Pedalandariki Illu Scheme, without initiating any land acquisition proceedings. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents relying upon the counter affidavit of the 3rd respondent submits that the respondent authorities identified the alternative land for providing house sites for the said welfare scheme. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, as the subject land is not touched for the above said purpose, no further orders are necessary in this matter. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 17.09.2025 PGT