Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 227/2013
Darshan Singh
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
Vinod Koul & Anr.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Nazia Fazal, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER (10.09.2025)
01.
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the name of the learned counsel for the petitioner being indicated in the cause list. This petition has been listed after a long time, having been lastly listed on 04.06.2013, when notice was directed to be issued.
02.
The absence on behalf of the petitioner seems to be for the reason that the grievance of the petitioner may have been redressed by implementation of the directions passed by this Court.
03.
Be that as it may, the contempt petition is disposed of with liberty to seek restoration of the instant contempt petition, in case cause survives.
(M A CHOWDHARY) JUDGE JAMMU
10.09.2025
Bunty
Sr. No. 18 Bunty Kumar 2025.09.11 14:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document