Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4975 (JK)

DARSHAN SINGH v. VINOD KOUL,SECY.REVENUE AND ANR.

CPSW/227/2013 · 2025-09-10

Ma Chowdhary

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CPSW No. 227/2013 Darshan Singh …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs Vinod Koul & Anr. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Nazia Fazal, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE ORDER (10.09.2025) 01. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the name of the learned counsel for the petitioner being indicated in the cause list. This petition has been listed after a long time, having been lastly listed on 04.06.2013, when notice was directed to be issued. 02. The absence on behalf of the petitioner seems to be for the reason that the grievance of the petitioner may have been redressed by implementation of the directions passed by this Court. 03. Be that as it may, the contempt petition is disposed of with liberty to seek restoration of the instant contempt petition, in case cause survives. (M A CHOWDHARY) JUDGE JAMMU 10.09.2025 Bunty Sr. No. 18 Bunty Kumar 2025.09.11 14:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document